Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of English Linguistics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Purnell, T.
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Structured Heterogeneity and Change in Laryngeal Phonetics

Upper Midwestern Final Obstruents

Thomas Purnell

Joseph Salmons

Dilara Tepeli

Jennifer Mercer

University of Wisconsin–Madison

American sociolinguists have largely ignored obstruents as invariant, including how speakers distinguish /s, t/ from /z, d/. Upper Midwestern final obstruents provide clear evidence that the realization of such contrasts can and does vary. In a once German-speaking Wisconsin town, we have found that speakers systematically produce final laryngeal distinctions differently than reported for American English, with an apparent partial neutralization of the distinction. Here, we seek the historical antecedents of this pattern, comparing acoustic characteristics of recordings from speakers throughout the region born from 1866–1986. Analysis by date of birth shows distinct obstruent phonetics over this whole period, revealing striking changes in which acoustic cues have been exploited to maintain the distinction: The oldest speakers used primarily glottal pulsing, younger ones exhibit a "trading relation" between pulsing and preceding-vowel duration, and the youngest have reduced the acoustic cues of the distinction dramatically.

Key Words: obstruents • sociophonetics • variation and change • voicing • trading relations • cue exploitation

Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 33, No. 4, 307-338 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0075424205285637


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
T. C. Purnell
Convergence and Contact in Milwaukee: Evidence From Select African American and White Vowel Space Features
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2009; 28(4): 408 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of English LinguisticsHome page
T. Purnell, E. Raimy, and J. Salmons
Defining Dialect, Perceiving Dialect, and New Dialect Formation: Sarah Palin's Speech
Journal of English Linguistics, December 1, 2009; 37(4): 331 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]