This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0075424207306710v1 36/1/39    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by WonHo Yoo, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Corpus Analysis of (The) Last/Next + Temporal Nouns

Sogang University Seoul, Korea

Many reference grammars cover the use of last and next, but none pays overt attention to when and why those words combine with ø or the before temporal nouns; for example, (a) I came to Boston ølast year and (b) I've been in Boston for the last year. Based on three theoretical notions of predicated time, extensivity, and the null article, and a corpus analysis of the tokens of (the) last/next from the Brown Corpus, the 1996 LA Times Corpus, and the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English, this article presents a detailed account of when the determiners last and next combine with null or the; why last/next followed by singular temporal nouns occur with null, as in (a), or with the, as in (b); and why only singular temporal nouns, but not plural temporal nouns or non-temporal nouns, can combine with null + last/next.

Key Words: extensivity • corpus analysis • definiteness • deictic reference • last and next • the null article • predicated time • temporal nouns

This version was published on March 1, 2008

Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 39-61 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0075424207306710


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?