This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brems, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Grammaticalization of Small Size Nouns

Reconsidering Frequency and Analogy

University of Leuven Belgium

This article discusses the grammaticalized status of low-frequency small size nouns (henceforth SSNs), such as jot of, scrap of, and flicker of, which cannot have engaged in the spiral routinization processes with attrition, decategorialization, and grammatical reanalysis characteristic of "default" grammaticalization. The proposal to account for the grammatical status of low-frequency complex prepositions in terms of grammaticalization by analogy is partially rejected. Corpus studies on nine SSNs show that mere analogy with one highly schematic construction, a+SSN+of, as instantiated by frequent a bit of, cannot be the sole factor involved in the grammaticalization of infrequent SSNs. Instead, more complex analogies with different quantifier models are involved which incorporate polarity sensitivity, similar to some and any, and which seem to serve as distant models in these analogies. However, in contrast to some and any, which can be used generally in quantifying contexts, the infrequent SSNs are further characterized by specific collocational and pragmatic values, and their appearance seems restricted to particular discourse contexts. More generally, the present article supports the claim that grammaticalization as such directly works on and results in (at least partially) substantive constructions, rather than schematic ones. It furthermore makes a claim for caution in describing what serves as a source for analogical extension, both in terms of describing all of the factors that come into play and deciding on the specific level of schematicity at which these need to be described.

Key Words: analogy • collocations • constructional schematicity • grammaticalization • low-frequency items • polarity sensitivity

References

• Brems, Lieselotte. 2003. Measure Noun Constructions: An Instance of Semantically-Driven Grammaticalization. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 283—312.
• Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, edited by Esther N. Goody, 56—289. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• ———. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Bublitz, Wolfram. 1996. Semantic Prosody and Cohesive Company: "Somewhat Predictable." Leuvense Bijdragen 85:1—32.
• Bybee, Joan. 2003a. Cognitive Processes in Grammaticalization. In The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, edited by Michael Tomasello, 145—67. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
• ———. 2003b. Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 602—23. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Crystal, David. 1991. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Paperback.
• Denison, David. 2002. History of the Sort of Construction Family. Paper presented at Second International Conference on Construction Grammar (ICCG2), Helsinki, September 7. Available at www.llc.manchester.ac.uk./SubjectAreas/LinguisticsEnglishLanguage/AcademicStaff/DavidDenison/.
• De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2006. Coming to Terms with Subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics 17:365—92.[CrossRef]
• Fischer, Olga. 1999. Grammaticalization: Unidirectional, Nonreversible? The Case of to before the Infinitive in English. Views 7:5—24.
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 1993. Vagueness's Puzzles, Polysemy's Vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4:223—72.
• Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the Development of Language. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, edited by William Pagliuca, 3—28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization. In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, edited by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon, 17—44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 575—601. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, edited by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, and Björn Wiemer, 21—42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. Are Low-Frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data—and the Importance of Intuition. In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, edited by Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair, 171—201. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Hopper, Paul. 1991. On Some Principles in Grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1, edited by Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine, 17—35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Israel, Michael. 1996. Polarity Sensitivity as Lexical Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 19:619—66.
• ———. 2004. The Pragmatics of Polarity. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 701—23. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• ———. Forthcoming. A Lot of Quantifiers. In Experimental and Empirical Methods (provisional title). Proceedings from CSDL 2004, edited by Sally Rice and John Newman.
• Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change. Lingua e Stile 20:303—18.
• ———. 2005. Theory and Method in Grammaticalization. In Grammatikalisierung, edited by Gabriele Diewald, 152—87. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Lessau, Donald A. 1994. A Dictionary of Grammaticalization. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
• Louw, Bill. 1993. Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, edited by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini- Bonelli, 157—76. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Noël, Dirk. 2005. The Productivity of a "Source of Information" Construction: Or, where Grammaticalization Theory and Construction Grammar Meet. Paper presented at FITIGRA (From Ideational to Interpersonal: Perspectives from Grammaticalization), University of Leuven, February 10—12.
• ———. 2006. Diachronic Construction Grammar vs. Grammaticalization Theory. Preprint nr. 255. Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven.
• The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (NSOED). 1993. Edited by Lesley Brown. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Oxford English Dictionary (OED). 2007. 3rd ed. online at http://www.oed.com.
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
• Sinclair, John. 1992. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1991. Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction. In Pragmatics: A Reader, edited by Steven Davis, 295—318. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1988. Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, edited by Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster, 406—16. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
• ———. 2003. Constructions in Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 624—47. Oxford: Blackwell.
• ———. 2005. From Ideational to Interpersonal: A Reassessment. Plenary lecture presented at FITIGRA (From Ideational to Interpersonal: Perspectives from Grammaticalization), University of Leuven, February 10—12.
• ———. 2006. Constructions and Language Change Revisited: the Concepts of Constructional Emergence and Coercion from the Perspective of Grammaticalization. Paper presented at CGN3, Düsseldorf, April 1—2.
• ———. Forthcoming. From Ideational to Interpersonal: A Reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics), edited by Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse, and Lieven Vandelanotte. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Journal of English Linguistics, Vol. 35, No. 4, 293-324 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0075424207307597


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brems, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?